LSE LSE Research Laboratory LSE
LSE Research Laboratory (RLAB)

Abstract for:

Living on Different Incomes in London: Can public consensus identify a 'riches line'?

Tania  Burchardt,  Abigail  Davis,  Ian  Gough,  Katharina  Hecht,  Donald  Hirsch,  Karen  Rowlingson,  Kate  Summers,  February 2020
Paper No' CASEreport127: | Full paper (pdf)
Save Reference as: BibTeX BibTeX File | Endote EndNote Import File
Keywords: income, wealth, rich, inequality, poverty

JEL Classification:

Is hard copy/paper copy available? YES - Paper Copy Still In Print.
This Paper is published under the following series: CASE Reports
Share this page: Google Bookmarks Google Bookmarks | Facebook Facebook | Twitter Twitter

Abstract:

London is home to vast and visible economic inequality, where the richest 10 per cent own 61 per cent of overall wealth, while at the same time four in ten Londoners do not earn enough for what is considered by the public to be a decent standard of living. This study sought to explore opinions about what constituted a standard of living that could be considered ‘fully flourishing’, and, by extension, if there was a point beyond that at which individual or household resources could be identified as being excessive. The findings provide thought-provoking insights into how people think about the protection wealth and higher incomes offer, and the judgements they make about the ‘deservingness’ of different sources of wealth and the uses to which it is put.