|This centre is a member of The LSE Research Laboratory [RLAB]: CASE | CVER | CEP | SERC | STICERD||Cookies?|
Paper No' SERCDP0048: | Full paper
Save Reference as: BibTeX File | EndNote Import File
Keywords: economic geography
JEL Classification: R0; R19
Is hard copy/paper copy available? YES - Paper Copy Still In Print.
This Paper is published under the following series: SERC Discussion Papers
Share this page: Google Bookmarks | Facebook | Twitter
Abstract:The reaction of economic geographers to the World Bank's World Development Report 2009 – Reshaping Economic Geography – has so far been a corporatist turf-protecting exercise. The report has been dismissed as the work of economists who completely ignore a rich tradition of work by ‘proper’ economic geographers. However, this negative response has prevented geographers from engaging constructively with the World Bank’s analysis and proposals. In this note I argue that, while the report presents an accurate diagnosis of recent development trends and should be praised for its flexibility in providing numerous policy alternatives, geographers can significantly contribute to promote a discussion around two key issues in the report: its treatment of institutions and its recommendation of spatially-blind policies.
Copyright © RLAB & LSE 2003 - 2020 | LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE | Contact: RLAB | Site updated 25 May 2020