|This centre is a member of The LSE Research Laboratory [RLAB]: CASE | CVER | CEP | SERC | STICERD||Cookies?|
Christian A. L.
Paper No' CEPDP1556: | Full paper
Save Reference as: BibTeX File | EndNote Import File
Keywords: second homes, wealth inequality, land use regulation, housing policy, house prices, unemployment
JEL Classification: D63; G12; R11; R21; R31; R52
Is hard copy/paper copy available? YES - Paper Copy Still In Print.
This Paper is published under the following series: CEP Discussion Papers
Share this page: Google Bookmarks | Facebook | Twitter
Abstract:We investigate how political backlash against wealthy investors in high-amenity places affects local residents. We exploit a quasi-natural experiment: the ‘Swiss Second Home Initiative’, which banned the construction of new second homes in desirable tourist locations. Consistent with our model, we find that the ban substantially lowered (increased) the price growth of primary (second) homes and increased the unemployment growth rate in the affected areas. Our findings suggest that the negative effect on local economies dominated the positive amenity-preservation effect. Constraining second home investments in locations where primary and second homes are not close substitutes may reinforce wealth inequality.
Copyright © RLAB & LSE 2003 - 2018 | LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE | Contact: RLAB | Site updated 18 July 2018