LSE LSE Research Laboratory LSE
LSE Research Laboratory (RLAB)

Abstract for:

Citizen's Income: Rights and Wrongs

David  Piachaud,  November 2016
Paper No' CASE/200: | Full paper (pdf)
Save Reference as: BibTeX BibTeX File | Endote EndNote Import File
Keywords: Citizenís Income, Basic Income, Conditionality, Social Justice

JEL Classification: H53; H55; I30; I380

Is hard copy/paper copy available? NO - Paper Copy Out Of Print.
This Paper is published under the following series: CASE Papers
Share this page: Google Bookmarks Google Bookmarks | Facebook Facebook | Twitter Twitter

Abstract:

A Citizen’s Income, or a Basic Income, is not a new idea but it has been receiving increasing attention. There is confusion about the idea and an attempt is made to distinguish different concepts. Then a full Citizen’s Income is examined in relation to four key criteria: the justice of an unconditional benefit; the possibility and fairness of a simple individual benefit; economic efficiency; and political feasibility. On all four criteria, Citizen’s Income fails. It is concluded that Citizen’s Income is a wasteful distraction from more practical methods of tackling poverty and inequality and ensuring all have a right to an adequate income.