|This centre is a member of The LSE Research Laboratory [RLAB]: CASE | CVER | CEP | SERC | STICERD||Cookies?|
Paper No' CEPDP1276: | Full paper
Save Reference as: BibTeX File | EndNote Import File
Keywords: Monetary policy, deliberation, FOMC, transparency, career concerns
JEL Classification: E52; E58; D78
Is hard copy/paper copy available? YES - Paper Copy Still In Print.
This Paper is published under the following series: CEP Discussion Papers
Share this page: Google Bookmarks | Facebook | Twitter
Abstract:How does transparency, a key feature of central bank design, affect the deliberation of monetary policymakers? We exploit a natural experiment in the Federal Open Market Committee in 1993 together with computational linguistic models (particularly Latent Dirichlet Allocation) to measure the effect of increased transparency on debate. Commentators have hypothesized both a beneficial discipline effect and a detrimental conformity effect. A difference-in-differences approach inspired by the career concerns literature uncovers evidence for both effects. However, the net effect of increased transparency appears to be a more informative deliberation process.
This paper has been published as:
'Transparency and Deliberation within the FOMC: A Computational Linguistics Approach', Stephen Hansen, Michael McMahon and Andrea Prat, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 133, Issue 2, May 2018
Copyright © RLAB & LSE 2003 - 2018 | LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE | Contact: RLAB | Site updated 15 August 2018